INX InControl

Currently all ad hoc reports must be built from the ground up which is very time consuming.

We are requesting the ability to scan a unique QR code and it would open one of the checklists we have built in the app which is specific to the QR code.

The ability to request action extensions to the due date from the action management window. Outline the new date and the reason for the extension and then a notification is sent to the approving supervisor. Once approved it will automatically update the action with the new due date.

It would be good to set restricted button mandatory for some events. We have some event types where we need it restricted but doesen't everyone know they need to click the button. So it will be good to set in administration option to select which events do we want to be restricted mandatory.

Regular request from end users regarding action creation is for the ability to review/approve actions prior to them being issued. Ie: Similar to the workflow functionality, where an event may be sent via a reviewer/approver to ensure the entered information and findings are correct. It has been requested that upon creation of an action – could a workflow or similar be triggered, where the action must be reviewed and released by a supervisor or nominated person. With all action management systems – there is a reliance on the end user having the conversation with the action owner, to ensure owner / details / due dates are correct. Having an integrated approval process to release the action would resolve the issue.

Create a tab that records field changes after an event has been submitted with time, date, changes made (old data-new data and by who.

Background: We are currently submitting about 10,000 lead indicators a month. We are pushing to submit events via the mobile app – great step to catching Checklist Data etc. Currently, of the 3,000+ Events submitted, there are still about 1,100 events from last month which are still sitting in “Submitted”. The issue we have is that as a submitter, you log the event via the mobile, them manage it a second time from within InControl, and either send for management, or send for closure etc. Request for Change: Can we change the app, so that it picks up the relevant workflow options (in App) and displays the two options which we currently see at the Submitted step: 1. Corrective Action Required – Assign to ERM for Management 2. No Corrective Action Required – Send for closure When this occurs, if the user selects “No Corrective Action Required”, then the event is actually submitted into InControl directly as the status of ‘Closed’? This is a major issue and source of frustration from the business. We are time poor at the ground level as it is, let alone trying to get leading hands etc. (who are predominantly in the field) having to log in and trying to manage their events, which in 95%+ of cases, do not require any type of management whatsoever.

There is no picture in reports. How can we make the incident photos appear in the report generated? For all our events registered in the system, we would like reports to show images, for example, the non- compliance and the corrective action taken. Thanks

A report for managers and supervisors to be able to proactively manage their KPIs and measure whether KPIs are being met.

InControl - Security Roles reassignment the ability to enter start and finish dates for security role reassignment. eg. Bob Smith is on leave 01/07/2024-30/07/2024 and his Event Approver securities are to be reassigned to Shane Clarke. Add a function like the event maintenance to select: Name of person going on leave (e.g Bob Smith) Person to reassign to (e.g Shane Clarke) What Security Roles to reassign (e.g. Event Approver) Start Date (e.g 01/07/2024) End Date (e.g 30/07/2024) InControl would then automatically reassign the Bob's event approver securities to Shane on the 01/07/2024, inactivate Bobs, then on the 30/07/2024 InControl then reactivate Bob's approver securities and deletes or inactivates the ones that were transferred to Shane. Preferably delete so they don't sit there and clutter up the security roles. Currently it is a manual process to reassign the securities back and when someone like the SSE goes on leave there are a ALOT of roles to reassign.